13 ms·
Well imagine somebody was talking about "bass" the fish, in a context of "bass" the instrument. If they pronounced it like the fish, certainly for a moment your
by Greduan 10mo ago
Well imagine somebody was talking about "bass" the fish, in a context of "bass" the instrument. If they pronounced it like the fish, certainly for a moment your language processing would stop, figure it out, fill in the gap, and continue.
Every time the wrong pitch accent is used, a similar process takes place. Especially in highly complex conversations, where a lot of processing power is going towards the semantics itself, and hopefully the person shouldn't have to worry about figuring out which word the other person is saying.
It's unclear if you yourself have native-level (or close to) pitch accent yourself. But if you don't, how can you know whether it's actually important or not?
- roughly 10mo agoJust remember, you can tune an instrument, but you can’t tuna fish.
- dredmorbius 10mo ago<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Can_Tune_a_Piano,_but_You_Can%27t_Tuna_Fish https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Can_Tune_a_Piano,_but_You_...> (originally by Groucho Marx: <https://ultimateclassicrock.com/kevin-cronin-reo-speedwagon-tuna-fish-album/ https://ultimateclassicrock.com/kevin-cronin-reo-speedwagon-...>). Or perhaps more HN-appropriate: <https://unixhistory.livejournal.com/1808.html https://unixhistory.livejournal.com/1808.html>.
- saltcured 10mo agoEh, in a discussion about homophones, homonyms, and ambiguity, I prefer the variant, "you can tune a bass, but you can tuna fish". Right up there with "fruit flies like a banana, but time flies like an arrow".
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]