3 ms·

I'm gonna try, thanks.

• koakuma-chan 11mo ago
  Oh shit https://itc.ua/en/news/ublock-origin-lite-ad-blocker-has-been-removed-from-the-firefox-store-now-the-extension-is-only-available-on-github/ https://itc.ua/en/news/ublock-origin-lite-ad-blocker-has-bee...
  • fn-mote 11mo ago
    Parent should include text not just a link. UBlock Origin Lite pulled from the Firefox extensions after being flagged for policy violation, now only available from GitHub.
    • koakuma-chan 11mo ago
      "The Firefox version of uBO Lite will cease to exist, I am dropping support because of the added burden of dealing with AMO nonsensical and hostile review process. " https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/197#issuecomment-2377395301 https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/197#issueco...
      • sunaookami 11mo ago
        There is no need to use uBOL on Firefox, just use the normal version. EDIT: But yeah, the Mozilla reviewers are very hostile, also had to fight with them for one of my add-ons. It's ridiculous that spam and malware add-ons get a pass but privacy-conscious add-ons get rejected.
        • immibis 11mo ago
          It's almost like ad monopoly company Google pays them millions of dollars.
          • sunaookami 11mo ago
            Not everything is a conspiracy theory. Mozilla's reviewers were already infamous in the XUL era. Mozilla's dumbness is not due to Google it's due to them themselves.
            • mafuy 11mo ago
              One would think properly reviewing one of the most important addons in Firefox would warrant spending sufficient resources, which Mozilla seems to have for less impactful stuff.