4 ms·
Have you tried "uBlock Origin Lite"? It is by the same author, Raymond Hill (gorhill). It has been working fine. I use "optimal" level for the filtering mode.
by da02 10mo ago
Have you tried "uBlock Origin Lite"? It is by the same author, Raymond Hill (gorhill). It has been working fine. I use "optimal" level for the filtering mode. (Note: I use Chromium on Linux)
- koakuma-chan 10mo agoI'm gonna try, thanks.
- koakuma-chan 10mo agoOh shit https://itc.ua/en/news/ublock-origin-lite-ad-blocker-has-been-removed-from-the-firefox-store-now-the-extension-is-only-available-on-github/ https://itc.ua/en/news/ublock-origin-lite-ad-blocker-has-bee...
- fn-mote 10mo agoParent should include text not just a link. UBlock Origin Lite pulled from the Firefox extensions after being flagged for policy violation, now only available from GitHub.
- koakuma-chan 10mo ago"The Firefox version of uBO Lite will cease to exist, I am dropping support because of the added burden of dealing with AMO nonsensical and hostile review process. " https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/197#issuecomment-2377395301 https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/197#issueco...
- sunaookami 10mo agoThere is no need to use uBOL on Firefox, just use the normal version. EDIT: But yeah, the Mozilla reviewers are very hostile, also had to fight with them for one of my add-ons. It's ridiculous that spam and malware add-ons get a pass but privacy-conscious add-ons get rejected.
- immibis 10mo agoIt's almost like ad monopoly company Google pays them millions of dollars.
- sunaookami 10mo agoNot everything is a conspiracy theory. Mozilla's reviewers were already infamous in the XUL era. Mozilla's dumbness is not due to Google it's due to them themselves.
- mafuy 10mo agoOne would think properly reviewing one of the most important addons in Firefox would warrant spending sufficient resources, which Mozilla seems to have for less impactful stuff.