3 ms·

You know who has great information density? Pornhub. If you open Pornhub on a 4K screen, you will absolutely see none of the thumbnails. I think YouTube is over

You know who has great information density? Pornhub. If you open Pornhub on a 4K screen, you will absolutely see none of the thumbnails. I think YouTube is overdoing it, but it is really a thing of: people are either using really small screens or 1080p. 4K is still not around much.

Nextgrid 10mo ago
Because unlike YouTube, porn is an actually competitive industry with plenty of “tube” sites to choose from. So they have to compete on UX.
- throwaway984393 10mo ago
  [dead]
- komali2 10mo ago
  Google "Ethical Capital Partners." Operates: Pornhub RedTube YouPorn Brazzers Digital Playground Men.com Reality Kings SpankWire
  - theideaofcoffee 10mo ago
    Not sure what this comment is getting at. Those may be the collection of sites owned by a single company, but there are still -oceans- of porn of every conceivable niche, on hundreds of thousands of sites, some still bigger than those. Whereas there’s pretty much a single, monopolized provider for mainstream video: youtube. And a porn conglomerate is the problem? GP is still correct, there’s still real competition in the space, unlike youtube.
  - chrneu 10mo ago
    Very US centric take here. Ya know there are other countries, languages, etc out there, right?
    - deleted 10mo ago
      [deleted]
    - komali2 10mo ago
      All of the websites I listed are in Mandarin for me and have content catered towards local fetishes. I have no idea what you're talking about.
      - taftster 10mo ago
        I saw "Mandarin" and "local fetishes" and thinking I'm glad I have no idea what you're talking about, too!
- chrneu 10mo ago
  There's an old adage that if you follow the tech that porn adopts, you'll generally be ahead the average consumer curve. I think there's another version that if porn adopts a tech that means that the tech will work. Like, a lot of VR adoption early on was porn. By a lot, I mean most.
  - IAmBroom 10mo ago
    Has VR caught on? Genuine question; I am not a gamer, but I see no real adoption elsewhere. The occasional movie is offered in 3D, but it's generally post-rendered, which makes the effect crappier - and it's occasional, not the majority.
    - greycol 10mo ago
      It's really hard to tell because with the currently high price for headsets it leans really hard into being a solitary activity. Don't get me wrong you can play games like beat saber ala singstar or rockband taking turns but it's an order of magnitude more if you want the second "controller" and you need much more space. Let alone the equivalent of buying an extra TV for everyone you want to watch a movie with. When you add on the ergonomics of the device which even with good setups mean you need "heavy" cabling or have limited runtime due to battery it's hard to recommend it to even mates who use their whole weekend on gaming. That being said I have a Pimax 8k I bought second hand and VR is really an awesome experience when you're in it so it's easy to see why the excitement is still there. I'll also mention some of the extreme sports camera stuff is often 360 if not 3d which benefits from a headset.
    - mghackerlady 10mo ago
      I've had a quest 2 since a bit before the meta rebrand. I like it, but I mostly use it for games. I used to be really into VRchat, which I wouldn't really consider a game. I stopped using it when it became increasingly clear the quest 2 just isn't powerful enough for it
- podgorniy 10mo ago
  Aah, the free market quazimonopolies avoid and despise at all costs (usually carried by customers)
1bpp 10mo ago
They just need to fix search..
- IAmBroom 10mo ago
  YT or PH? I mean, both, really.
  - deleted 10mo ago
    [deleted]
makeitdouble 10mo ago
Yes. 1080p screen density is still so popular. Looking around new laptops it's still the bulk in Windows land, including OLED and ultra high refresh rate monitors. Same for TVs. Even on macs many are using scaling factors that render close to 1080p. The issue really would be why YouTube can't bother managing more layouts. It still blows my mind there's only one single YouTube experience per platform, when their viewership basically span the world's population.
- gessha 10mo ago
  Because they fired a bunch of engineers, fired/reorged the PMs and whoever is left is working on the AI shlop.
- array_key_first 10mo ago
  On laptops more than 1080p (or an aspect ratio equivalent) is just a waste. Less battery life and everything is too small to see anyway so you have to scale.
  - makeitdouble 10mo ago
    Higher DPI is still pretty nice and noticeable for people who spend their life reading/peeking (including comic books, art etc.). I feel more people would benefit from better screens even for their reports or excel work, but I wouldn't be holding my breath on most standard companies paying for it if there's no OSHA style law mandating it. > battery life I think we've reach a decent place, even the Surface Pro line with around 3K displays has double digit battery life for office type tasks.

Nextgrid 10mo ago

Because unlike YouTube, porn is an actually competitive industry with plenty of “tube” sites to choose from. So they have to compete on UX.

throwaway984393 10mo ago
[dead]
komali2 10mo ago
Google "Ethical Capital Partners." Operates: Pornhub RedTube YouPorn Brazzers Digital Playground Men.com Reality Kings SpankWire
- theideaofcoffee 10mo ago
  Not sure what this comment is getting at. Those may be the collection of sites owned by a single company, but there are still -oceans- of porn of every conceivable niche, on hundreds of thousands of sites, some still bigger than those. Whereas there’s pretty much a single, monopolized provider for mainstream video: youtube. And a porn conglomerate is the problem? GP is still correct, there’s still real competition in the space, unlike youtube.
- chrneu 10mo ago
  Very US centric take here. Ya know there are other countries, languages, etc out there, right?
  - deleted 10mo ago
    [deleted]
  - komali2 10mo ago
    All of the websites I listed are in Mandarin for me and have content catered towards local fetishes. I have no idea what you're talking about.
    - taftster 10mo ago
      I saw "Mandarin" and "local fetishes" and thinking I'm glad I have no idea what you're talking about, too!
chrneu 10mo ago
There's an old adage that if you follow the tech that porn adopts, you'll generally be ahead the average consumer curve. I think there's another version that if porn adopts a tech that means that the tech will work. Like, a lot of VR adoption early on was porn. By a lot, I mean most.
- IAmBroom 10mo ago
  Has VR caught on? Genuine question; I am not a gamer, but I see no real adoption elsewhere. The occasional movie is offered in 3D, but it's generally post-rendered, which makes the effect crappier - and it's occasional, not the majority.
  - greycol 10mo ago
    It's really hard to tell because with the currently high price for headsets it leans really hard into being a solitary activity. Don't get me wrong you can play games like beat saber ala singstar or rockband taking turns but it's an order of magnitude more if you want the second "controller" and you need much more space. Let alone the equivalent of buying an extra TV for everyone you want to watch a movie with. When you add on the ergonomics of the device which even with good setups mean you need "heavy" cabling or have limited runtime due to battery it's hard to recommend it to even mates who use their whole weekend on gaming. That being said I have a Pimax 8k I bought second hand and VR is really an awesome experience when you're in it so it's easy to see why the excitement is still there. I'll also mention some of the extreme sports camera stuff is often 360 if not 3d which benefits from a headset.
  - mghackerlady 10mo ago
    I've had a quest 2 since a bit before the meta rebrand. I like it, but I mostly use it for games. I used to be really into VRchat, which I wouldn't really consider a game. I stopped using it when it became increasingly clear the quest 2 just isn't powerful enough for it
podgorniy 10mo ago
Aah, the free market quazimonopolies avoid and despise at all costs (usually carried by customers)

1bpp 10mo ago

They just need to fix search..

IAmBroom 10mo ago
YT or PH? I mean, both, really.
- deleted 10mo ago
  [deleted]

makeitdouble 10mo ago

Yes. 1080p screen density is still so popular. Looking around new laptops it's still the bulk in Windows land, including OLED and ultra high refresh rate monitors. Same for TVs. Even on macs many are using scaling factors that render close to 1080p. The issue really would be why YouTube can't bother managing more layouts. It still blows my mind there's only one single YouTube experience per platform, when their viewership basically span the world's population.

gessha 10mo ago
Because they fired a bunch of engineers, fired/reorged the PMs and whoever is left is working on the AI shlop.
array_key_first 10mo ago
On laptops more than 1080p (or an aspect ratio equivalent) is just a waste. Less battery life and everything is too small to see anyway so you have to scale.
- makeitdouble 10mo ago
  Higher DPI is still pretty nice and noticeable for people who spend their life reading/peeking (including comic books, art etc.). I feel more people would benefit from better screens even for their reports or excel work, but I wouldn't be holding my breath on most standard companies paying for it if there's no OSHA style law mandating it. > battery life I think we've reach a decent place, even the Surface Pro line with around 3K displays has double digit battery life for office type tasks.