4 ms·
I only tangentially follow the semiconductor companies... However, I know several advanced algorithms in the realm of cryptography can be computationally expen
by unix-dude 14y ago
I only tangentially follow the semiconductor companies...
However, I know several advanced algorithms in the realm of cryptography can be computationally expensive, and as demand for security grows, several of these semiconductor companies have implemented things in the hardware to optimize certain forms of encryption. (I can't remember if it was Intel or AMD that released a chip with some sort of built-in support for security).
This is just a theory, but if they're going down this road, it would make sense for them to develop a highly secure algorithm that they know can be easily implemented and optimized on the hardware level. If they're developing specialized algorithms AND hardware, they can probably take it into account during the design process and further optimize their boards.
Or, a bunch of semiconductor guys are also crypto-geeks. Which is pretty likely anyway :D.
- novalis 14y agoYou were maybe thinking of Intel® vPro™ Technology ?
- lmz 14y agoAES-NI perhaps: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/advanced-encryption-standard--aes-/data-protection-aes-general-technology.html http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-tech...
- pjscott 14y agoAll of the SHA-3 candidates were designed to be implementable in fast hardware. Here's a comparison of some of the hardware designs evaluated during the competition: http://ehash.iaik.tugraz.at/wiki/SHA-3_Hardware_Implementations http://ehash.iaik.tugraz.at/wiki/SHA-3_Hardware_Implementati... Keccak is one of the most amenable to hardware acceleration, but all of the finalists were good in both hardware and software.