3 ms·
That's a bit ironic: Avatar was best known for its 3D effects, which you generally can't see at home. That may not outweigh the rest of the problems with theat
by jfengel 11mo ago
That's a bit ironic: Avatar was best known for its 3D effects, which you generally can't see at home.
That may not outweigh the rest of the problems with theaters: the price of tickets, the cost of concessions, the noise, the inconvenient times, not being able to pause, etc. But if there was one movie that benefitted specifically from being seen in a theater, it was Avatar.
- soulofmischief 11mo agoI had to take off the glasses during any scene with movement because of how nauseatingly blurry and dim the experience was with them on. Coraline is still the only Real3D experience I remember fondly.
- mkl 11mo agoI did see it in 3D originally, and that didn't outweigh the rest. I've seen a couple of movies in 3D, and while it's an interesting novelty, I doubt it could ever be essential to the experience. I don't think Avatar benefitted much from it.
- sieabahlpark 11mo ago[dead]