4 ms·
Chat controls. Again? How can this even be legal? -- to try and try and try ... against all odds. Doesn't make any sense to discuss that on a bi-yearly basis.
by GuestFAUniverse 11mo ago
Chat controls. Again?
How can this even be legal? -- to try and try and try ... against all odds.
Doesn't make any sense to discuss that on a bi-yearly basis.
- dfawcus 11mo agoBecause of the nature of the treaties forming the EU, and the structures it generates. It is basically a regulatory union, constructed so as to transpose power to the center, then hold it there. It can't allow the people to have too much say, as that is "populism", which gets in the way of the bureaucracy doing its thing. The only way to end / prevent this proposal from being repeated until "success" is to pass another treaty entrenching that something like Chat Control is forbidden. That is an extremely low probability event, and gets lower as more member states join.
- potato3732842 11mo ago>is to pass another treaty entrenching that something like Chat Control is forbidden. That'll work about as well as "shall pass no law", "papers and effects" and "infringed". You gotta mean it. Everyone's gotta mean it. And by mean it I mean make peace with all the potential bad things that entails.
- constantcrying 11mo agoThe EU is notoriously, and by design, unresponsive to democratic pressures. >to try and try and try ... against all odds. Doesn't make any sense to discuss that on a bi-yearly basis. This is quite naive. These people know what they are doing and it isn't too uncommon to consider certain packages of law multiple times.
- greenavocado 11mo agoThey will never stop restricting speech until all criticism of Israel and affiliates is punishable by death