4 ms·

Well, C++ also has higher-order functions and lambda expressions, and yet we don't call it a functional programming language.

• pjmlp 11mo ago
  Are you sure? Search for "Functional Programming in C++: How to improve your C++ programs using functional techniques".
  • Rochus 11mo ago
    Yes. It's by standard a "general purpose" programming language, not a "functional" language, and it definitely corresponds with the IEEE definition for OOP (in contrast to the mentioned Rust or Go languages). I thought I would give a clear example that the fellow would immediately understand. However, I seem to have underestimated the postmodernist tendencies of today's world.
    • CyberDildonics 11mo ago
      If it's a general purpose language and not a functional language just because it has function features, then why would it be an 'OOP' language just because it has 'OOP' features?
      • Rochus 11mo ago
        Correct. (did I say something else?)