2 ms·
Bracketing would solve all of that. Im pretty sure the spirit of this is not to tax working class people into relying on a pension. Im sure everyone agrees Jef
by yfw 11mo ago
Bracketing would solve all of that. Im pretty sure the spirit of this is not to tax working class people into relying on a pension.
Im sure everyone agrees Jeff Bezos shouldnt be taxed the same as someone who needs retirement planning
- tpmoney 11mo agoPerhaps, but the Norway tax mentioned in the article kicks in at $174k net worth. That's a paid off house and a nearly drained 401k for even the poorest of Americans. Yes there is an exemption for part of the house, but even if it were 100% exempt, I think you're going to have a rough time getting support for taxing 1% of a retirement account worth less than the code section it's named for.
- tpmoney 11mo agoReplying to myself since it's too late to edit, but according to these numbers[1], it looks like this tax would hit about 52% of American households, so my "even the poorest of Americans" is a bit overwrought. And if we take the US median home price (~410k as of this year[2]) and exclude 75% of that (~307k), then this tax would hit ~30% of American households (~$481k net worth). Even at that, it's still quite a hurdle to clear to convince the top 1/3 of households support a 1% tax on their accumulated wealth. [1]: https://dqydj.com/net-worth-percentiles/ https://dqydj.com/net-worth-percentiles/ [2]: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS