4 ms·
I'm curious if others are finding that there's a comfort in staying within the Claude ecosystem because when it makes a mistake, we get used to spotting the pat
by cyrusradfar 11mo ago
I'm curious if others are finding that there's a comfort in staying within the Claude ecosystem because when it makes a mistake, we get used to spotting the pattern. I'm finding that when I try new models, their "stupid" moments are more surprising and infuriating.
Given this tech is new, the experience of how we relate to their mistakes is something I think a bit about.
Am I alone here, are others finding themselves more forgiving of "their preferred" model provider?
- irthomasthomas 11mo agoI guess you where not around a few months back when they over-optimized and served a degraded model for weeks.
- cyrusradfar 11mo agothat's funny you just made me connect the dots. I was! I spent several days spinning in place after I thought it could help me clean up my code quality with biome. Afterwards it destroyed the whole app and I needed to figure out how it worked -- that need, inspired me to prototype and extension for vccode I'm actually still building :)
- irthomasthomas 11mo agoYep, that was it! That really turned me off anthropic and closed models until they provide regular quality tests. I use chutes ai, now. They tell you exactly which model/quant and server config they use, so you know if you have trouble with a task, it's not the model.