3 ms·
Fwiw, JPEG XL takes around 2.5x the time to decode as an equivalent AVIF, and has worse compression https://jakearchibald.com/2025/present-and-future-of-progres
by jaffathecake 11mo ago
Fwiw, JPEG XL takes around 2.5x the time to decode as an equivalent AVIF, and has worse compression https://jakearchibald.com/2025/present-and-future-of-progressive-image-rendering/#jpeg-xl https://jakearchibald.com/2025/present-and-future-of-progres...
- eviks 11mo agoInteresting, looks like another opportunity for Chrome to avoid the Safari mistake > slow. There's some suggestion that the Apple implementation is running on a single core, so maybe there's room for improvement. Though their own old attempt was even worse > of the old behind-a-flag Chromium JPEG XL decoder, and it's over 500% slower (6x) to decode than AVIF.