4 ms·
This is the year of Linux on the desktop!
by SirFatty 11mo ago
This is the year of Linux on the desktop!
- andrewinardeer 11mo agoAny decade now.
- pelagicAustral 11mo agotwo more weeks
- danpalmer 11mo agoIt sure is: https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steammachine https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steammachine
- gherkinnn 11mo ago[dead]
- pjmlp 11mo agoNah, that is the Year of Windows Gaming, running on Proton.
- wiseowise 11mo agoSemantics.
- pjmlp 11mo agoThose semantics hide that game studios keep using Windows workstations, developing Windows games, creating kernel drivers, targeting Windows users as customers, and it is up to Valve to make those games run on SteamOS.
- powerclue 11mo agoSeems like you moved the goalposts pretty far... Consumers using Linux has shot up pretty dramatically this year, at least in my social circles. I count at least a dozen, non technical friends who decided to drop windows. That number has been zero a year for decades. Game devs working in Linux is always a lagging indicator. Once there's a market share, they'll go there. Once it's the preferred os for people, you'll be able to develop on it. Games is already an incredibly risky market sector. Instead, I encourage you to look at blender. It's gone through a "cute hobbyist/prosumer tool" phase and is now in the mega million dollar movies and games use it as their primary tool. Desktop Linux is on a similar curve thanks to Valve. If enough people start using it at home, industry will flip over.
- pjmlp 11mo agoNope, they are still on the same spot, Proton isn't Linux gaming, is making Windows ecosystem available on Linux, because Valve has failed to provide enough value for game studios to target SteamOS natively. Blender was a commercial product that became FOSS, with an existing customer base.
- powerclue 11mo agoPeople using Linux as their desktop OS are using desktop Linux. What binaries they run on that OS doesn't change what OS they are running. You've developed a "No true Scotsman" definition for desktop Linux that seems far from the common understanding that "if you use Linux as your OS on your desktop, you are a desktop Linux user". If you feel your definition of purity tested "only Linux binaries or it doesn't count as a Linux desktop" is better, I'm not going to tell you you are wrong, just expect that you have a definition significantly out of the norm and will have a challenging uphill battle in getting others to adopt it.
- pjmlp 11mo agoIt is called GNU/Linux for a reason.