3 ms·
Everyone agrees with this obviously but it's like saying that we should be able to levitate or live in utopia. It's almost a law of nature that the types that b
by colordrops 11mo ago
Everyone agrees with this obviously but it's like saying that we should be able to levitate or live in utopia. It's almost a law of nature that the types that become powerful are not your most savory individuals and will use the power to reinforce their positions.
- tjwebbnorfolk 11mo agoThis is obviously true, but people will downvote it because they don't like it.
- Ar-Curunir 11mo agoYou're talking like society hasn't changed power structures over the years. How things are is not some unchangeable physical law.
- colordrops 11mo agoI never said it was a physical law, hence the word "almost". Just saying it's a strong trend. Why is everyone so literal here?
- xmprt 11mo ago> It's almost a law of nature We have tons of different systems for accumulating power all over the world. Corporate structures, democracy vs autocracy, etc. In each of those societies, we see different types of leaders on a sliding scale of savoriness. My point is that clearly there are some forms of governance which result in more savory people and so you can argue that it's the systems that define the outcomes rather than any "law of nature".
- martin-t 11mo agoIt's a law of nature that they will _try_.[0] That's why people should always have ways of defending themselves, whether it's with courts or guns. [0]: This is not a figure of speech - many anti-social traits which result in NPD, ASPD and their subclinical versions[1] are genetic. There is literal evolutionary pressure to exploit others. [1]: Meaning the trait is sufficiently pronounced to be harmful to others but not enough to be harmful to the person having it so it's not diagnosed as a disorder.
- ekjhgkejhgk 11mo agoNo, not everyone agrees. A LOT a people buy into "oh but they're a really important person, they should be made extra allowances".