3 ms·
Dup https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539 [edit: not a dup!]
by benzible 11mo ago
Dup https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539
[edit: not a dup!]
- swsieber 11mo agoThis article has quite a bit more information though.
- dang 11mo agoThanks—I've added this link to the toptext at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539.
- thih9 11mo agoNot a dup, this is a different article about the same event, with different information too.
- a4isms 11mo agoPlease use the word "Dup" for a resubmission of the same link and "See also" for a different submission.
- neogodless 11mo agoSee also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46032539 Shai-Hulud Returns: Over 300 NPM Packages Infected (helixguard.ai) ~6 hours ago | 430 comments
- dang 11mo agoOk, we've merged the (relevant) comments thither. Thanks! Edit: Here's a bit of explanation for those curious. Even though the links are different, the test we use for whether to merge threads is whether they are substantially the same story vs. whether the two links will lead to substantially different discussion. In this case it's clear that it's the same discussion, so I merged them. Since the second link has additional information, I've added it to the toptext of the original post. That way people can look at both.