4 ms·
Yeah, this proposition had me scratching my head, as well. I guess the OP's method is, in some sense, easier, but it doesn't strike me as easy. When I imagine e
by wonderzombie 14y ago
Yeah, this proposition had me scratching my head, as well. I guess the OP's method is, in some sense, easier, but it doesn't strike me as easy. When I imagine easy, I imagine ad-hoc DSLs in Ruby or (dare I say it) Lisp.
- draegtun 14y ago> When I imagine easy, I imagine ad-hoc DSLs in Ruby or (dare I say it) Lisp. These are what Martin Fowler calls an internal domain-specific language. These Ruby/Lisp/Perl/Scala/etc embedded DSL's blur the lines between an API and a DSL. What the OP is referring to is a full blown (external) DSL.