3 ms·
My impression was part of the issue was ANT is a proprietary Garmin protocol and so never really gained traction or imprint beyond those devices. Without meanin
by derbOac 11mo ago
My impression was part of the issue was ANT is a proprietary Garmin protocol and so never really gained traction or imprint beyond those devices. Without meaning to sound too critical or supportive of BLE, I think something more open would be better for that area anyway.
- Lio 11mo agoAs far as I’m aware most manufacturers of fitness equipment were supporting ANT+. ANT+ (vs ANT) is proprietary but licensing was free and large part of the spec are open. There were definitely a lot of manufacturers supporting it. Not just on watches and GPS units but also on some phones.