4 ms·
35 years seem quite excessive. Taking half your life to get your stuff back?
by k__ 11mo ago
35 years seem quite excessive.
Taking half your life to get your stuff back?
- brainwad 11mo agoI mean, it's pretty generous. In most other domains, if you sell something of yours, it's gone and you have no right to claw it back later.
- vessenes 11mo agoit's a double edged sword -- media companies are generally franchise/lifetime hits oriented businesses - they pay (and generally lose, per investment, btw) for a shot at a hit. On the one hand, imagine they could only negotiate rights to monetize that hit for, say, one year, and then this termination right kicked in. What do you think would be the top offer they could make an author? The fraction of creatives that are great creatives and also great marketers/producers/runners of media companies is small, really small. So, creatives have an incentive to have a system where some amount of time is contractable. And media licensors rely on this hits-based model to fund all their development and betting on things that don't work out. And also to fund their jets and cool Bel-Air homes.
- k__ 11mo agoSure, but what about 10 or 15 years?
- vessenes 11mo agovery reasonable ideas! Of course creators could license for this term right now, but generally they do not have the bargaining power when they need it.
- zelphirkalt 11mo agoThey could simply set up contracts that give some percentage to the author over time. But they don't want to sign away percentages, I guess.