3 ms·
Isn't it the ultimate task for any good efficiency routine to delete itself?
by wonderwonder 11mo ago
Isn't it the ultimate task for any good efficiency routine to delete itself?
- seattle_spring 11mo agoWouldn't it need to actually accomplish something first?
- __loam 11mo agoLet's not get cute when we're describing an organization that violated the impoundment act and data privacy laws to such an extreme degree, in addition to causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of people due to the impoundment of USAID resources. While Elon was waving a chainsaw around, children were starving while the food meant for them rotted in a pallet.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- jeremyjh 11mo agoConsidering what it accomplished, it would have been even more efficient if it had never happened.
- FireBeyond 11mo agoAnd yet the USG has spent $400B more since DOGE, not $2T less. How's that "efficient"?
- phantasmish 11mo agoIt’ll be very surprising if DOGE per se didn’t cost money, rather than save it, by the time lawsuits and extra costs incurred by their interrupting things that shouldn’t have been interrupted are accounted for.
- BLKNSLVR 11mo agoIt's just a shame it wasn't the first line of code.