2 ms·
> Obviously this will not just be stored on your phone. There will be a backend database of all issued IDs. Which will then serve as an authoritative identity s
by squidbeak 11mo ago
> Obviously this will not just be stored on your phone. There will be a backend database of all issued IDs. Which will then serve as an authoritative identity system for unifying government databases.
Incorrect, that isn't the proposed system at all. In fact, Government is kept out of the loop, except as a reference. You seem not to understand what the IDs are, so I'll try again to explain their form.
The wallet (the app) holds data that you enter. A datum might be your name or national insurance number, citizenship etc. These are verified individually by the verification service and it returns each one with a cryptographic signature. The 'ID' is then a container for proofs. It exists only on your phone. It's totally disposable. Delete a container and you can regenerate it. And you'll have more than one, many more in fact, for all different uses. Each will have a different selection of attributes and their signatures. The IDs never exist anywhere else other than on your phone. There's no database of IDs, and the app has no contact itself with the government API. Representing it in any other way is a fundamental misunderstanding of the proposal. The proposed format simply doesn't work the way you claim.
- masfuerte 11mo agoIf this is true then the original government records are authoritative. The digital ID is not. So the government's claims about its own scheme are false. Is that right?
- squidbeak 11mo agoBoth are true, the attribute/proof pairs are guaranteed by those cryptographic proofs. It's better thought of as a way for a citizen to submit their data with authority.