5 ms·
Isn't it worth the balance between stability and effort to go with LTS (long term support / security updates only)? You know the updates on LTS will be relativ
by daveguy 11mo ago
Isn't it worth the balance between stability and effort to go with LTS (long term support / security updates only)?
You know the updates on LTS will be relatively much safer. The limit of potential breaking updates to every 2 years is mostly the point. But if you're just talking about a home lab where you want to use the latest advances without the latest exploits, try a dependency cooldown. Simon Willison recently pointed out this post by William Woodruff about dependency cooldowns [0]. Wait a day between update release and adoption to identify supply chain compromises.
In other words: Don't move fast. Don't break things.
Or: Move slow. Keep things.
[0] https://blog.yossarian.net/2025/11/21/We-should-all-be-using-dependency-cooldowns https://blog.yossarian.net/2025/11/21/We-should-all-be-using...