3 ms·
>> It is an attempt to attain peace and economic stability for the region in a way which will prevent the conflict from flaring up again in the near future. "
by ponector 11mo ago
>> It is an attempt to attain peace and economic stability for the region in a way which will prevent the conflict from flaring up again in the near future.
"Peace for our time!" Some people skipped history lessons. Russia is not winning the war. To give them Ukrainian capitulation is to reward for starting a war.
>> Because the West is guilty of far worse war crimes in the past 50 years, and the whole world knows this.
Typical russian whataboutism. But I bite. What crimes west did in past 30 years? Russia started war in Afghanistan, invaded Syria, Georgia, Ukraine.
>> the details of the peace plan
Nothing there about real punishment russia will get when the next invasion/annexion is going to be.
Just a reminder, russia lost to Ichkeria, signed a peace treaty with Chechen. Guess what happened next? Russians always lie.
- MomsAVoxell 11mo agoWhat crimes of the West? The illegal invasion of Iraq and the murder of 5% of its population - which still suffers, day by day. The destruction of Afghanistan. The destruction of Libya. The funding and support of ISIS. The support of Israels' genocide of Gaza. Somalia. Syria. Yemen. Pakistan. Uganda. Niger. The list goes on and on, why don't you educate yourself here: https://airwars.org/ https://airwars.org/ Or perhaps you think the USA is infallible and should be able to murder whoever its ruling class deems worthy. >Nothing there about real punishment russia will get when the next invasion/annexion is going to be. Untrue. If Russia violates the agreement, the door is open for the rest of the world to wage wholesale war on it. You clearly have not read the terms.
- ponector 11mo ago>> door is open for the rest of the world to wage wholesale war on it. Open by whom? And btw, it is already open, just no one wants to send troops to Ukraine except North Korea. >> The destruction of Afghanistan. Conveniently forgot a decade of russian occupation of Afghanistan. >>The destruction of Libia Khalifa Haftar, the warlord who controls east part of the country is backed up by Russia. In other African countries multiple warlords are backed up by russia. >> The support of Israels' genocide of Gaza. Russia arms different forces around Israel as well. And list goes on. >>invasion of Iraq and the murder of 5% of its population - which still suffers, day by day 5% is another lie, not backed by data. Just one more point you may be simply a russian-backed agent tasked to share their narratives.
- MomsAVoxell 11mo ago5% is backed by data, you just haven't bothered to investigate. Every single day for decades now Iraqi mothers have given birth to still-born children - 50% of children born in Baghdad - because of the US' use of depleted uranium on the battlefield - a war crime if any other nation were to do it. https://psr.org/resources/body-count/ https://psr.org/resources/body-count/ >russian-backed agent This is about as productive as me calling you a bootlicker for empire, which I won't do. I'm not a Russian - I'm simply a member of a co-criminal state in the absolutely phony, criminal 'war on terror', who is willing to hold my government accountable for the heinous crimes committed in my name. Why are you not so willing to take responsibility for our nations war crimes?
- ponector 11mo agoCould not find there an estimated 1150000 (5%) deaths in the provided data. 50% still-born children is also fake considering fertility rate 4+ for decade after the war. You don't need to be a russian to share RT narratives. Also that is what a russian spy will say: "I'm not an agent" because, you know, russians always lie.
- MomsAVoxell 11mo agoWhereas Americans are the most propagandized people on the planet, and are willing to support countless heinous wars based on lies which destroy the lives of millions of innocent human beings, all for the sake of robotic national pride…
- _t9ow 11mo ago> Typical russian whataboutism Not the person you replied to, but this isn't constructive. Correctly pointing out hypocrisy/double standards is very pertinent to the discussion, and shouldn't be dismissed as "whataboutism". Making assumptions about someone who disagrees with you -- in this case, the assumption that he/she is a Kremlin sympathiser -- is irrelevant at best and insulting at worst.