The tenor of the article is more like: Markdown is holding LLMs back. And it assumes the semantic enrichment comes for free. While I agree that other formats al

The tenor of the article is more like: Markdown is holding LLMs back. And it assumes the semantic enrichment comes for free. While I agree that other formats allow for that and it's nice to see the solid options: nope, nobody in our team has the time to do such a chore and we are fine with the information we leave for each other. It's analogous to the whining of the semantic web folks. The semantic web hasn't happened as a whole. Same problem there: who would curate all the data?