> The vast majority of steam games run just fine when not started via steam. AFAIK many of them still rely on Steam, though. They'll run when you manually run

> The vast majority of steam games run just fine when not started via steam. AFAIK many of them still rely on Steam, though. They'll run when you manually run the exe, but will they run on a machine that doesn't have Steam installed and doesn't have internet access? I know some will, but I'm skeptical that just being able to start the game from the exe means it's not linking in Steam services and will work in such a scenario. > Family sharing works fine, and how is steam going to prevent you from giving your acct to your kids? They've banned accounts in the past for being transferred. Why wouldn't they do that again? Also, doesn't it seem a bit silly that the solution to a service shortcoming is "just violate the rules of the service"? Why not just offer transfers and make the service better? And, AFAIK, you're probably technically violating copyright the same by transferring the account to your kids as you are by pirating. Your kids don't have a license to the game, only you do (and it's non-transferable). Regarding family sharing, not all games support it. Additionally, that wasn't always an option (namely, back when Gabe made this statement). And that ties into another issue with Steam: you're at the mercy of what Valve chooses to do. If, in 2035, they decide that they're going to charge a monthly fee to access the games you bought, you're just up shit creek. If they decide to remove family sharing, drop support for your platform, etc. I don't understand why I would want a license I bought in 2006 to rely on a service's decisions in 2035.