3 ms·
The thing that drives me nuts is that most "AI Applications" are just adding crappy chat to a web app. A true AI application should have AI driven workflows tha
by CuriouslyC 11mo ago
The thing that drives me nuts is that most "AI Applications" are just adding crappy chat to a web app. A true AI application should have AI driven workflows that automate boring or repetitive tasks without user intervention, and simplify the UI surface of the application.
- commandar 11mo agoI'm firmly of the opinion that, as a general rule, if you're directly embedding the output of a model into a workflow and you're not one of a handful of very big players, you're probably doing it wrong.[1] If we overlook that non-determinism isn't really compatible with a lot of business processes and assume you can make the model spit out exactly what you need, you can't get around the fact that an LLM is going to be a slower and more expensive way of getting the data you need in most cases. LLMs are fantastic for building things. Use them to build quickly and pivot where needed and then deploy traditional architecture for actually running the workloads. If your production pipeline includes an LLM somewhere in the flow, you need to really, seriously slow down and consider whether that's actually the move that makes sense. [1] - There are exceptions. There are always exceptions. It's a general rule not a law of physics.