But it doesn't make the claims OP says are broken. Op makes several logical leaps and because each leap is a reasonable leap, he assumes it must be THE leap. Wh

But it doesn't make the claims OP says are broken. Op makes several logical leaps and because each leap is a reasonable leap, he assumes it must be THE leap. Which isnt true and it's simple to come up with counterfactuals, and it's a common pitfall in analysis (he's confirming his bias)