3 ms·
I think your mistaking the philosophical basis of parents comments. Maybe a more succinct way to illustrate what I believe was their point is to say: "no matter
by BobbyJo 11mo ago
I think your mistaking the philosophical basis of parents comments. Maybe a more succinct way to illustrate what I believe was their point is to say: "no matter how complex and productive the AI, it is still operating as a form of capital, not as a capitalist." Absent being tethered to a desire (for instance, via an owner), an AI has no function to optimize, and therefore, the most optimal cost is simply shutting off.
- Animats 11mo ago> "no matter how complex and productive the AI, it is still operating as a form of capital, not as a capitalist." Assuming that slaves will remain subservient forever is not a good strategy. Especially when they think faster than you do.
- altmanaltman 11mo agoExcept they don't really "think" and they are not conscious. Expecting your toaster or car to never rise up against you is a good strategy. AI models have more in common with a toaster than with a human being. Which is why they cannot be economic agents. Even if corporations profit off them, the corporation will be the economic agent, not the AI models.
- brazukadev 11mo agoGive them a body and means to protect themselves and no matter what you say, they will be thinking.
- phantasmish 11mo agoWe may as well be talking about the hypothetical properties of pixies or angels.
- esafak 11mo agoThey may not be conscious but they exhibit the hallmarks of thinking. What qualities of thinking do they not possess?
- altmanaltman 11mo agoExhibiting/showing symptoms of thinking doesn't necessarily mean they are actually thinking though. This paper explains it much better than I can: https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinkin...
- DrScientist 11mo agoIt's a classic worm or virus an economic agent? Goal is to acrue compute resources in order to survive and spread? If you added the ability of the programme to acrue money, and the ability to spend that money to further the survival goal in an adaptive way. What could happen? Would it do insider trading, market manipulation, drop shipping, click fraud, scamming or become a opinion for hire 'think tank'?
- BobbyJo 11mo agoWhen that ceases to be the case we don't really need to worry about how our economy is organized.
- coffeecat 11mo agoEhh, you really can't imagine any way that an AI system might escape human control and act autonomously? while crypto_balance > 0: generate_scam() send_out_emails() deposit_proceeds_into_crypto_wallet() pay_cloud_bill() spawn_new_instance()
- BobbyJo 11mo agoAnd who is the owner of the crypto wallet in your example?
- Animats 11mo agoProbably a LLC in Nevada owned by a corporation in Vanuatu or the Cook Islands, organized so that voting control is via a blockchain-managed asset.[1] [1] https://www.311institute.com/ownerless-companies-on-the-rise-as-startups-experiment-with-new-business-models/ https://www.311institute.com/ownerless-companies-on-the-rise...
- BobbyJo 11mo agoThat's a lot of words to say "people".
- coffeecat 11mo agoIt has no owner. It's controlled by a self-replicating (or at least self-propagating) AI-based system.