4 ms·
The windshield test is somewhat deceptive as improved aerodynamics plays a role, but the difference is still quite noticeable when driving around in a classic c
by Retric 11mo ago
The windshield test is somewhat deceptive as improved aerodynamics plays a role, but the difference is still quite noticeable when driving around in a classic car.
- magicstefanos 11mo agoBut a lot of people drive old as shit cars.
- TulliusCicero 11mo ago"Old as shit" is still a moving target. An old as shit car from 30 years ago is not the same model year as an old as shit car today.
- cosmic_cheese 11mo agoTo memory, cars started getting a lot more aerodynamic through the 90s. You have to go back to the 80s to find boxy designs throughout mainstream cars, at which point you’re looking at vehicles somewhere in the ballpark of 40 years old. Anecdotally, I’ve not seen many of those on the road. It’s not too unusual to see a late 90s something puttering around town, but 80s and older is unusual, even in rural areas.
- rjsw 11mo agoSomeone driving the same car for a long time will have seen the change in numbers of insects getting stuck to it.
- dlcarrier 11mo agoI drive a car that was released 25 years ago (a 7th-gen Celica) and it has a coefficient of drag of 0.32, which beats many vehicles currently in production, including multiple electric vehicles.
- Retric 11mo agoNow compare that to a car which would have been 25 years old, 30 years ago.
- maxerickson 11mo agoThe other thing is that the cleared right of way on highways is larger. Both because highways are larger and because it reduces things like animal strikes.
- e40 11mo agoYou're telling me the trend of those big, flat noses (chins?) aren't bug collectors?