> Society would have you believe that self hosting a NAT Gateway is “crazy”, “irresponsible” and potentially even “dangerous”. I just can't take articles serio

> Society would have you believe that self hosting a NAT Gateway is “crazy”, “irresponsible” and potentially even “dangerous”. I just can't take articles seriously when they lead with these kind of claims and then don't back them up. Typically to give their articles some sort of justification and/or weight. Did not bother to read the rest.