3 ms·
> "Take interests"? If by that you mean in education, then this is false. No. > because Jews were permitted to issue loans with interest to non-Jews Exactly,
by 1718627440 1y ago
> "Take interests"? If by that you mean in education, then this is false.
No.
> because Jews were permitted to issue loans with interest to non-Jews
Exactly, what I was saying, so you did get it.
> And not all Jews were rich, either. This is an exaggeration.
I did not say that. What I stated was that the rich educated were disproportionally (secular) Jews.
- lo_zamoyski 1y ago> No. Not a great response. > What I stated was that the rich educated were disproportionally (secular) Jews. That came later, in the 19th century with the so-called emancipation of the Jews. Before that, "secular Jews" were not really a thing.
- 1718627440 1y ago> Not a great response. >> If you ment ... > No I didn't. What more is there to say? > That came later, in the 19th century with the so-called emancipation of the Jews. Before that, "secular Jews" were not really a thing. Yes, I was talking about the German culture from late 19th to 20th century, which was what the Nazis found and were eager to destroy. This did have roots in the middle ages, which I mentioned. A few rich people are enough to hate a whole group. White men are also not all rich, yet they are displayed as the privileged which need to be disadvantaged by some today.