4 ms·
I get your point, but i think the real issue is -(1/(-1/x)). It is the one that is being overlooked the most in our society, as if it were something normal, but
by youoy 11mo ago
I get your point, but i think the real issue is -(1/(-1/x)). It is the one that is being overlooked the most in our society, as if it were something normal, but it contains some of the deepest truths imho.
- iamgopal 11mo agohow about -1/(-(1/(-1/x))) ? How many roads must a man walk down before we can call him a man ?
- zkmon 11mo agoNo need of walking, they just need to be able to read post properly before calling him a man.
- zkmon 11mo agoNo you didn't get it. You missed "Let's consider them as operations. Apply any one of them on any other of them, you get the third one."
- youoy 11mo agoSo is what i wrote a third one? Fourth? Fifth? :)
- zkmon 11mo agoNot sure what you are talking about. What you wrote reduces to just x. What I meant was, if you substitute say, -x for x in -1/x, you get 1/x, which is the third inverse. Same is true for the other two pairs. So, if we call them functions f, g and h, then, f=g(h)=h(g); g=f(h)=h(f); h=f(g)=g(f)