4 ms·
Yeah, the author really tries everything to avoid calling it a sex tracker but the app store listing right now literally says "Sex, Partner Cycles, and Health"
by thewebguyd 11mo ago
Yeah, the author really tries everything to avoid calling it a sex tracker but the app store listing right now literally says "Sex, Partner Cycles, and Health"
I'm not sure what else they expected? 16+ seems appropriate to me. I can buy the argument for a need of additional categories, though.
- mslt 11mo ago“Partner Cycles” particularly describes a domestic surveillance situation that caters to an audience I’m not looking to spend time with
- procinct 11mo agoI can see their point if it genuinely is just a tracker/journal. It’s effectively just words. Should books that describe sex also be age restricted? As they raised, games with gacha mechanics and violence receive a lower rating. I feel the complaint is less about the app receiving that rating and more the flawed logic around how they are categorized given it’s effectively a health and wellness tracker.
- windows_hater_7 11mo agoBooks that describe sex are somewhat age restricted. Something like Looking for Alaska is rated 16+ by Common Sense Media and not in elementary or middle school libraries.