4 ms·
As Steve Jobs muses that Snow white was enjoyed 60 years after it's release but computers go to the sedimentary layer. While it's true that you can't re-release
by djmips 11mo ago
As Steve Jobs muses that Snow white was enjoyed 60 years after it's release but computers go to the sedimentary layer. While it's true that you can't re-release the 1984 Mac debut to fanfare and profit 40 years later - a small group of dedicated enthusiasts are still running their original Macs and others in emulation - so they arent' completely fossilized!
- ayaros 11mo agoAmen!
- Wowfunhappy 11mo agoBut are they using it as the bicycle for the mind it was intended to be—to get work done, or at least be creative and express ideas—or are they just playing some games and seeing what they can get running?
- popalchemist 11mo agoThe value of Snow White is not diminished with time, though. Whereas the value of the original Mac is very linked to its time, and diminishes with each passing day.
- muglug 11mo agoIt does diminish slightly though? Snow White is not a Disney tentpole the way it was in the 50s or even in the 80s. How many 8-year-olds could pick out Snow White in a line-up?
- petercooper 11mo agoThe remake of Snow White was only released earlier this year, so quite a few, if you mean the broad character.
- brians 11mo ago…all of them. Which is why the scene in Ralph Breaks the Internet works. And why some of the Shrek jokes work.
- beowulfey 11mo agoIf you visit Disneyland regularly, Snow White is just as popular for costumes as any other princess and has been for a long time!
- alt227 11mo ago> How many 8-year-olds could pick out Snow White in a line-up? Literally all of them. You obviously dont have kids!
- simondotau 11mo agoAll films diminish with time; only a minuscule number of films have cultural relevance that spans decades. Though it can be misleading to look to Disney films here, because they spend buttloads of money keeping successful films in their archive perennially relevant — through lavishly marketed home releases and, more recently, remakes.
- famouswaffles 11mo agoThe remakes are primarily a way to bank on the sustained relevance of some movies, not to keep them. Remakes of movies that are no longer relevant flop or heavily underperform and release to little fanfare.
- popalchemist 11mo agoYes, the existence of the remakes is proof in favor of the continued relevance, not the opposite. Companies like Disney don't invest hundreds of millions (or more, if you count ancillary merchandising) in something they don't know to have an audience. Even when the films bomb theatrically, they make money in the long run through the "long tail" (VOD / home video purchases) and merchandising. So, yeah, the remakes are indicative of a continued relevance. Furthermore the original Snow White has a particular longevity since it was the first Walt Disney animated feature -- and the first animated feature in color. On top of that, it is based on the Grimm fairy tale which, though published in 1812, was likely in existence for hundreds of years prior to that publication. Per Joseph Campbell, stories like that have a continued relevance because they are expressing archetypal concerns; their value is not rooted in time, but in the unchanging aspects of the human psyche that remain relevant hundreds of years later. So... yeah. Though there is a slight diminishment in the sense of its aesthetics, it objectively continues to be relevant, seeing as it was literally in theaters this year.