3 ms·
Fascinating. Is it fair to state that you are the type of person that would rather have an innocent be trampled by the system than a guilty go free? Because, un
by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 11mo ago
Fascinating. Is it fair to state that you are the type of person that would rather have an innocent be trampled by the system than a guilty go free? Because, unironically too, you managed to do just that to ~3 million Buddhists in US[1] -- quite literally a religious minority.
Naturally, this is before we get to the fun parts like definition of a nazi, that a sane system would normally not focus on 'true positives', but whether it is reasonable.
Honestly, you make me smile. Do you know why? Because I know, just as you do in your heart of hearts, that if dura lex sed lex came after you, you would be trying to tell me how unfair the system is and that it should let you slip through the cracks.
Still, know that I love you; as flawed as you are.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_in_the_United_States
- techblueberry 11mo ago“ Is it fair to state that you are the type of person that would rather have an innocent be trampled by the system than a guilty go free? ” Nope. I think it’s something like a 27:1 ratio. I don’t believe in moral absolutism.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 11mo agoThen the problem is -- thankfully -- more nuanced. How do you reconcile those competing ideas within you?