4 ms·
If it was necessary to file an appeal clearly there is some truth to what I said - or WIPO would never issue a decision that needed to be overturned. As for th
by wilfra 14y ago
If it was necessary to file an appeal clearly there is some truth to what I said - or WIPO would never issue a decision that needed to be overturned.
As for the appeals process itself, yet it is a loophole that you can file an appeal in front of any podunk judge that will hear the case, whether or not he's ever even been on the internet or knows what a domain name is - and if that judge finds in your favor, you get to keep the domain. Again, that doesn't make what I said untrue.
- DannyBee 14y agoYour logic is simply broken. WIPO makes 3000+ UDRP decisions a year. Some will be right, some will be wrong. This is just reality. It has nothing to do with whether "there is some truth to what you said". Correlation does not imply causation.
- wilfra 14y agoIf you appeal a WIPO decision in front of some judge who doesn't know a thing about the internet and that judge rules in your favor, you have not just proven WIPO made a mistake - but that is how you are choosing to interpret his decision. You're clearly a typo-squatter or somebody who otherwise traffics in TM domains, so I'm never going to get you to agree with me on this, and that is fine, we don't need to agree. But your personal attacks are unnecessary.
- DannyBee 14y agoYes, I traffic in thousands of TM domains. It's not that i'm a corporate IP lawyer who has dealt with a lot of these situations before (only on the fighting typo-squatters side, hilariously enough), and so my view is more nuanced than yours. Instead, i'm just a typo squatter. You caught me.