3 ms·

It should be illegal for the government to do so, further make it illegal for businesses to do so AND for city, county, state, federal governments to utilize th

It should be illegal for the government to do so, further make it illegal for businesses to do so AND for city, county, state, federal governments to utilize third party databases.

martin-t 11mo ago
Restrictions and oversight should increase proportionally to the power an entity has. This is a very under-appreciated concept.
JumpCrisscross 11mo ago
> make it illegal for businesses to do so AND for city, county, state, federal governments to utilize third party databases Local control and storage should be a requirement.
- LazyMans 11mo ago
  You do not want local govt each building their own “secure” system.
  - JumpCrisscross 11mo ago
    > You do not want local govt each building their own “secure” system I really do. A centralised, insecure [1] database could lead to America losing a war. A distributed system of low-reliability nodes is more robust than a centralised system that's very reliable. "ARPANET," after all "was built to explore technologies related to building a military command-and-control network that could survive a nuclear attack." (That's not what it wound up becoming.) [1] https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/03/lawmakers-say-stolen-police-logins-are-exposing-flock-surveillance-cameras-to-hackers/ https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/03/lawmakers-say-stolen-polic...