> “Nah no need to investigate any more, enough people have said they’re satisfied.” Such a person would rightly be scoffed at. The thing is, you need a new ang

> “Nah no need to investigate any more, enough people have said they’re satisfied.” Such a person would rightly be scoffed at. The thing is, you need a new angle for an investigation to be justified. There have been thousands on studies on vaccines and their long term side-effects. You can't be saying "what if they cause autism" at this point and expect people to drop everything and take you serious. You need to be showing some evidence first because all the low hanging and even high hanging fruit has been picked. It's like if you were going "wheels don't roll". Sure, maybe they don't and reality spins around them. But there's a gazillion studies about tire composition and their effectiveness so if you want somebody to take you seriously you need to show some work first.