2 ms·
> One thing we've leaned heavily into was using Langgraph for agentic workflows Probably my single biggest mistake so far with developing LLM tooling so far ha
by embedding-shape 1y ago
> One thing we've leaned heavily into was using Langgraph for agentic workflows
Probably my single biggest mistake so far with developing LLM tooling so far has been to try to use Langgraph even after inspecting the codebase, because people I thought were smarter than me hyped it up.
Do yourself a favor and just write the plumbing yourself, it's a lot easier than one might think before digging into it, and tool calling is literally a loop passing tool requests and responses back and forth until the model responds, and having your own abstractions will make it a lot easier to build proper workflows. Plus you get to use whatever language you want and don't have to deal with Python.
- CjHuber 1y agoI can recommend looking into DSpy, I haven’t felt the need to use any other LLM based frameworks though I‘m open to suggestions
- embedding-shape 1y agoThere really isn't need, all they add is additional code to be responsible for, building the same abstractions yourself but focused on your use case will be something like 50-100 lines of code, hard to beat the simplicity, and the understanding you'll get.