4 ms·

I don't think i've seen on HN discussions any criticism directed at rust that was acknowledged as high quality though.

• aw1621107 1y ago
  Probably the best example I can think of off the top of my head is "Leaving Rust gamedev after 3 years", which got a fair bit of (positive!) attention both on HN [0] and on /r/rust [1]. If you look through the comments there a huge proportion of them generally agree with the article, and the top comment explicitly calls it "a good article". On /r/rust Josh Triplett (one of the Rust devs) has the top comment on the post basically acknowledging that the criticisms are valid/reasonable and thanking the author for their feedback [2]. I've seen other criticisms spawn good discussions and/or a good number of people agreeing, but nothing quite as clearly on point as that off the top of my head. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40172033 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40172033 [1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1cdqdsi/lessons_learned_after_3_years_of_fulltime_rust/ https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1cdqdsi/lessons_learn... [2]: https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1cdqdsi/lessons_learned_after_3_years_of_fulltime_rust/l1e722d/ https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1cdqdsi/lessons_learn...