The whole thing is the punchline. If you're missing something, read strken's response elsewhere in this thread, because he put it in a better way than I have an

The whole thing is the punchline. If you're missing something, read strken's response elsewhere in this thread, because he put it in a better way than I have anywhere else here - none of it is serious, and if you read it seriously, you are the other punchline: > argumentum ad absurdum indictment of the way the "cost" of pollution is calculated.