3 ms·
https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2025/03/08/AMD-YOLO.html https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2025/03/08/AMD-... https://tinygrad.org/ htt
by manjose2018 11mo ago
https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2025/03/08/AMD-YOLO.html https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2025/03/08/AMD-...
https://tinygrad.org/ https://tinygrad.org/ is the only viable alternative to CUDA that I have seen popup in the past few years.
- bigyabai 11mo agoViable how? "Feasible" might be a better word here, I haven't heard many (any?) war-stories about a TinyBox in production but maybe I'm OOTL.
- erichocean 11mo agoBoth Mojo and ThunderKittens/HipKittens are viable on AMD.
- balaclava9 11mo agoMojo runs faster on nvidia hardware than CUDA in some cases. https://x.com/clattner_llvm/status/1982196673771139466?s=61 https://x.com/clattner_llvm/status/1982196673771139466?s=61
- djsjajah 11mo agoI can't tell if you are making a joke or not. They are not even remotely equivalent. tinygrad is a toy. If you are serious, I would be interested to hear how you see tinygrad replacing CUDA. I could see a tiny grad zealot arguing that it is gong to replace torch, but CUDA?? Have you looked into AMD support in torch? I would wager that like for like, a torch/amd implementation of a models is going to run rings around a tinygrad/amd implementation.