> But I'm making the point that its not malicious compliance. It’s totally technically feasible to have a non-blocking opt-in box. But sites effectively make

> But I'm making the point that its not malicious compliance. It’s totally technically feasible to have a non-blocking opt-in box. But sites effectively make a legally mandated opt-in dialog into an opt-out dialog by making it block the site. Blocking the page loading until the banner is dismissed is definitely malicious, and arguably not compliant at all. And lets not get started on all the sites where the banner is just non-functional smoke screen.