3 ms·

I still want something no one has, which is the ability to launch agents in different git worktrees simultaneously and check the results out on my main branch f

I still want something no one has, which is the ability to launch agents in different git worktrees simultaneously and check the results out on my main branch for testing when they are finished.

bradly 11mo ago
Would this be similar to how Charlie and Jules work?
cube2222 11mo ago
I think I’ve described how I achieve kinda your desired workflow in a comment yesterday [0]. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45970668 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45970668
- agentifysh 11mo ago
  ha! very interesting how slept on jj is its been essential to my workflow as well i use both jj and git and jj is great for just creating a snapshot that i can revert to incase it fails im still exploring it to see what else i can do with it for agentic use
agentifysh 11mo ago
lots of tools that do this and I ended up going down this rabbit hole something that could just plug in to codex instead of requiring a fork http://github.com/agentify-sh/10x http://github.com/agentify-sh/10x does minimal overhead with agent orchestration (its just a bash/typescript) as its main focus was adding enhancements to codex like double redundant checkpoint via git and jj (lessons learned from codex being git reset --hard happy), something like claude skills (just a bunch of mds that steer it towards specific activity like think, plan, execute), timeout wrappers (to get you unstuck if codex waits a long time), blacklist commands during yolo (rm -rf, git reset banned even if it by small chance run it) MIT licensed you can work sequentially (subagents launch one after the other) or parallel (worktrees) but tbh sequentially is better because you understand what is going on with parallel it might be best for dealing with tests and UI.
- poly2it 11mo ago
  Your link is a 404.
lysecret 11mo ago
Cursor has this too
rane 11mo ago
tmux users might find this useful: https://github.com/raine/workmux https://github.com/raine/workmux
ygouzerh 11mo ago
I am curious: why would you you like to have that? (Genuine question, I am personally so scared about the AI going crazy and putting slop everywhere that I often ask it to focus on a single well defined area first)

I still want something no one has, which is the ability to launch agents in different git worktrees simultaneously and check the results out on my main branch for testing when they are finished.

bradly 11mo ago

Would this be similar to how Charlie and Jules work?

cube2222 11mo ago

I think I’ve described how I achieve kinda your desired workflow in a comment yesterday [0]. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45970668 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45970668

agentifysh 11mo ago
ha! very interesting how slept on jj is its been essential to my workflow as well i use both jj and git and jj is great for just creating a snapshot that i can revert to incase it fails im still exploring it to see what else i can do with it for agentic use

agentifysh 11mo ago

lots of tools that do this and I ended up going down this rabbit hole something that could just plug in to codex instead of requiring a fork http://github.com/agentify-sh/10x http://github.com/agentify-sh/10x does minimal overhead with agent orchestration (its just a bash/typescript) as its main focus was adding enhancements to codex like double redundant checkpoint via git and jj (lessons learned from codex being git reset --hard happy), something like claude skills (just a bunch of mds that steer it towards specific activity like think, plan, execute), timeout wrappers (to get you unstuck if codex waits a long time), blacklist commands during yolo (rm -rf, git reset banned even if it by small chance run it) MIT licensed you can work sequentially (subagents launch one after the other) or parallel (worktrees) but tbh sequentially is better because you understand what is going on with parallel it might be best for dealing with tests and UI.

poly2it 11mo ago
Your link is a 404.

lysecret 11mo ago

Cursor has this too

rane 11mo ago

tmux users might find this useful: https://github.com/raine/workmux https://github.com/raine/workmux

ygouzerh 11mo ago

I am curious: why would you you like to have that? (Genuine question, I am personally so scared about the AI going crazy and putting slop everywhere that I often ask it to focus on a single well defined area first)