4 ms·
I made a downdetector for downdetector's downdetector's downdetector
- mikeve 11mo agoThis downdetector seems to be down. We might need another downdetector.
- donkey_brains 11mo agoOk, this is getting ridiculous…
- squigz 11mo agoThis isn't funny anymore. Go to reddit to do this.
- bartekpacia 11mo agoIt is funny, go complain on reddit
- sam0x17 11mo agoWe watch the watchers that watch the watchers
- user_7832 11mo agoBut who watches the watchers that watch the watchers that watch the watchers?
- Joker_vD 11mo agoDo we really need more than two down-detectors? Just point them at each other...
- cmos 11mo agoA good start, but let's see more.
- invalidstring 11mo agoWhat is Benoit B. Mandelbrot's middle name? Benoit B. Mandelbrot.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- 2gremlin181 11mo agoThe next step: Point downdector to downdector's downdector's downdector and create a cyclic dependency
- korse 11mo agoTrace buster buster buster
- charles_f 11mo agoThis seems more valuable than one level down. Or is it up? Or in?
- cactusplant7374 11mo agoThis seems really useful.
- perrygeo 11mo agoI love the joke. The thing is, it's not so funny when companies actually try to do this on their own systems. I've never seen a 4x deep observability stack. But I have seen 3x, an entire project team dedicated to building a system that watches the watchers. It gets absurd.