3 ms·

You can also call it undemocratic, not just because blue states are actively subverting them, but because the intent of the subversion is to create new voters a

You can also call it undemocratic, not just because blue states are actively subverting them, but because the intent of the subversion is to create new voters and shift demographics into their favor.

4MOAisgoodenuf 11mo ago
> "To create new voters" How do you imagine this working? You do realize that voter registration requires proof of citizenship, correct?
- woodpanel 11mo ago
  See comment thread below
scoofy 11mo ago
I actually don’t think that’s relevant. I don’t think people vote for one party or another because of their race or ethnicity. I think assuming people vote along ethnic lines is honestly pretty idiotic, and I think the last two elections have demonstrated this as being entirely sensible.
- woodpanel 11mo ago
  Interesting that you imply I said anything about race. I didn’t. Never mind that the reason people point out the last two elections is that they show statistical anomalies - which is by itself proving my point. The data is clear on this. But further it runs counter to simple game theory. If a Country, governed by Party A, enacts a law, prohibiting Nazis from immigrating, but Party B undermines that law in municipalities they rule in (by providing „sanctuary cities“, stopping law enforcement on such matters entirely, providing services including legal help for naturalization, and more things) basically stretching the timeframe as long as possible for illegal Nazis to be present in the country, so that they either become eligible Nazi voters locally (by residence status), naturalized Nazi citizens eventually or at least have Nazi offspring with a citizenship title – then obviously the Nazis are going to vote for the party that allowed that to happen (Party B), and against that party that tried to stop this (Party A). And this will (decreasingly with each generation) be true for their Nazi offspring as well.

You can also call it undemocratic, not just because blue states are actively subverting them, but because the intent of the subversion is to create new voters and shift demographics into their favor.

4MOAisgoodenuf 11mo ago

> "To create new voters" How do you imagine this working? You do realize that voter registration requires proof of citizenship, correct?

woodpanel 11mo ago
See comment thread below

scoofy 11mo ago

I actually don’t think that’s relevant. I don’t think people vote for one party or another because of their race or ethnicity. I think assuming people vote along ethnic lines is honestly pretty idiotic, and I think the last two elections have demonstrated this as being entirely sensible.

woodpanel 11mo ago
Interesting that you imply I said anything about race. I didn’t. Never mind that the reason people point out the last two elections is that they show statistical anomalies - which is by itself proving my point. The data is clear on this. But further it runs counter to simple game theory. If a Country, governed by Party A, enacts a law, prohibiting Nazis from immigrating, but Party B undermines that law in municipalities they rule in (by providing „sanctuary cities“, stopping law enforcement on such matters entirely, providing services including legal help for naturalization, and more things) basically stretching the timeframe as long as possible for illegal Nazis to be present in the country, so that they either become eligible Nazi voters locally (by residence status), naturalized Nazi citizens eventually or at least have Nazi offspring with a citizenship title – then obviously the Nazis are going to vote for the party that allowed that to happen (Party B), and against that party that tried to stop this (Party A). And this will (decreasingly with each generation) be true for their Nazi offspring as well.