4 ms·

The first patch release (released on launch day) says: "Messaging to distinguish particular users hitting their user quota limit from all users hitting the glob

by r00tbeer 11mo ago

The first patch release (released on launch day) says: "Messaging to distinguish particular users hitting their user quota limit from all users hitting the global capacity limits." So, collectively we're hitting the quota, its not just your quota. (One would think Google might know how to scale their services on launch day...) The Documentation (https://antigravity.google/docs/plans https://antigravity.google/docs/plans) claims that "Our modeling suggests that a very small fraction of power users will ever hit the per-five-hour rate limit, so our hope is that this is something that you won't have to worry about, and you feel unrestrained in your usage of Antigravity."

thelittleone 11mo ago
With Ultra I hit that limit in 20 minutes with Gemini 3 low. When the rate limit cleared some hours later, I got one prompt before hitting limit again.
- big_man_ting 11mo ago
  perhaps you were feeding into its the context your whole node_modules folder? :/
  - SR2Z 11mo ago
    You'd really hope that an AI IDE would know to respect .gitignore
    - big_man_ting 11mo ago
      you'd hope so, the same way you'd hope that AI IDEs would not show these package/dependency folder contents when referencing files using @ - but i still get shown a bunch of shit that i would never need to reference by hand
- doiskoh 11mo ago
  If by "Ultra", you're referring to the Google AI Ultra plan, then I just want to let you know that it doesn't actually take Google AI plans into consideration. It seems like the product will have its own separate subscription. At the moment, everyone is on the same free plan until they finalize their subscription pricing/model (https://antigravity.google/docs/plans https://antigravity.google/docs/plans). On a separate note, I think the UX is excellent and the output I've been getting so far are really good. It really does feel like AI-native development. I know asking for a more integrated issue-tracking experience might be expanding the scope too much but that's really the biggest missing feature right now. That and, I don't like the fact that the "Review Changes" doesn't work if you're asking it to modify reports that are not in the current workspace that's open.
user34283 11mo ago
One would think this would have been obvious when it fails on the first or second request already, yet people here all complain about rate limits. When I downloaded it, it already came with the proper "Failed due to model provider overload" message. When it did work, the agent seemed great, achieving the intended changes in a React and python project. Particularly the web app looks much better than what Claude produced. I did not see functionality to have it test the app in the browser yet.
Deathmax 11mo ago
Depending on which shared GCP project you get assigned to, mine had a global 300 million tokens per minute quota that was being hit regularly.

thelittleone 11mo ago

With Ultra I hit that limit in 20 minutes with Gemini 3 low. When the rate limit cleared some hours later, I got one prompt before hitting limit again.

big_man_ting 11mo ago
perhaps you were feeding into its the context your whole node_modules folder? :/
- SR2Z 11mo ago
  You'd really hope that an AI IDE would know to respect .gitignore
  - big_man_ting 11mo ago
    you'd hope so, the same way you'd hope that AI IDEs would not show these package/dependency folder contents when referencing files using @ - but i still get shown a bunch of shit that i would never need to reference by hand
doiskoh 11mo ago
If by "Ultra", you're referring to the Google AI Ultra plan, then I just want to let you know that it doesn't actually take Google AI plans into consideration. It seems like the product will have its own separate subscription. At the moment, everyone is on the same free plan until they finalize their subscription pricing/model (https://antigravity.google/docs/plans https://antigravity.google/docs/plans). On a separate note, I think the UX is excellent and the output I've been getting so far are really good. It really does feel like AI-native development. I know asking for a more integrated issue-tracking experience might be expanding the scope too much but that's really the biggest missing feature right now. That and, I don't like the fact that the "Review Changes" doesn't work if you're asking it to modify reports that are not in the current workspace that's open.

user34283 11mo ago

One would think this would have been obvious when it fails on the first or second request already, yet people here all complain about rate limits. When I downloaded it, it already came with the proper "Failed due to model provider overload" message. When it did work, the agent seemed great, achieving the intended changes in a React and python project. Particularly the web app looks much better than what Claude produced. I did not see functionality to have it test the app in the browser yet.

Deathmax 11mo ago

Depending on which shared GCP project you get assigned to, mine had a global 300 million tokens per minute quota that was being hit regularly.