4 ms·

I didn’t think pre-commit was that slow but I’ll admit I am intrigued. UV has been a godsend so why not?

• emschwartz 11mo ago
  Agreed. For a Rust project, running Clippy and rustfmt is slow, but I’d be surprised to learn that pre-commit itself was a non-negligible part of that.
• rsyring 11mo ago
  You can speed up pre-commit a lot by making it use uv but it requires a separate project: https://github.com/tox-dev/pre-commit-uv/discussions/51 https://github.com/tox-dev/pre-commit-uv/discussions/51 The pre-commit author was straight up hostile to discussions of uv support and ended up deleting the issue I started and banned me from the GH repo. Weirdest OSS experience I've ever had.
  • cweagans 11mo ago
    Wow, that guy is something. wtf is his problem.
    • jgb1984 11mo ago
      I did some digging in the issues and PR's of pre-commit, the guy seems to be a major douche. Too bad, because uv is amazing. Might look at an alternative to pre-commit in the future.
      • Numerlor 11mo ago
        I recently found out I've been banned from all of their repositories on GitHub, while as far as I'm aware our only interaction was on a duplicated bug issue I created, as I didn't manage to find the original with GitHub's search like in the linked issue from the OP. I've been moving away from their tools with this and the resistance to implement/merge useful things that basically everyone wants
    • deleted 11mo ago
      [deleted]