sure he defined it. However what he defined is not what anything is based on or is so it isn't nearly as useful a term as supporters like to think. clasical li

sure he defined it. However what he defined is not what anything is based on or is so it isn't nearly as useful a term as supporters like to think. clasical liberalism is a lot more complex than what he defined, and that is the system most of us live in. Calling it capitalism is wrong, as is thinking ecconomics based on that term matters much in the real world