3 ms·

I don't think that's quite right - Rebble has updated a number of these apps to keep them supported. As sibling commenter posted, the original apps are availabl

by radlad 11mo ago

I don't think that's quite right - Rebble has updated a number of these apps to keep them supported. As sibling commenter posted, the original apps are available publicly.

mikepurvis 11mo ago
Updated themselves? Or accepted/hosted updates from third parties?
- Anonbrit 11mo ago
  Updated themselves
  - whyenot 11mo ago
    Are they still open source? If so, why does it matter who updated them?
    - repeekad 11mo ago
      I think that’s the crux of the issue is rebble isn’t under any obligation distribute them open source, unless say the original app had a “copyleft” policy?
    - micromacrofoot 11mo ago
      AFAIK the original apps were individually licensed by the creators... so Rebble would need to have permission before claiming anything for their own except in the case of explicit permissive licenses (like MIT). In some cases (copyleft licenses) Rebble would be required to make their maintenance also open source.