6 ms·
You could argue that they are ruining the value of the signal for everyone.
by lmz 11mo ago
You could argue that they are ruining the value of the signal for everyone.
- whstl 11mo agoIf it was about signal-to-noise, there would be no bullying of bald people, or short people.
- coldtea 11mo agoOr it could still be, but have other explanation. E.g. you're called out if you ruin the signal to noise ration, but you're also called out if you genuinely give the unfit signal. (Don't approve doing this or anything, just pointing the blind spot in your dichotomy, interested in the argument on a purely technical manner).
- whstl 11mo agoHN never ceases to surprise me with the rationalizations for any kind of behavior.
- coldtea 11mo agoYou keep using this word rationalization. I don't think it means what you think it means
- whstl 11mo agoNope. I'm using it correctly. You might be in denial, though ;)
- boat-of-theseus 11mo ago[dead]