3 ms·
You're doing nothing wrong. Even gemini users realise that inline images are good actually.
by troupo 1y ago
You're doing nothing wrong. Even gemini users realise that inline images are good actually.
- cantalopes 1y agoLike "they are good". Whole html with its features is "good", but when i want to use a privacy- first protocol, why the hell would i undermine it with tracking pixels, especially since it noted as the very feature of this protocol
- troupo 1y agoAh yes. The main feature of images is tracking pixels. And not, you know, images.
- voxic11 1y agoThere are plenty of ways to implement images without allowing for tracking pixels. Only allowing images to be served from first party domains would be a simple one.
- krapp 1y agoIt would be noisy and would break the page size limit but you could also require that images be included inline as base64 encoded strings.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]